I propose in this article
to place before the world the result of investigation in comparative
religion, in so far as it tends to fix the comparative ages of two of the
world's oldest religions, namely, Jainism and Hinduism. I am aware that my
views are not very likely to be acceptable to the generality of the
readers at present, but I am confident that they shall ultimately prevail.
Such is always the case with all new 'things'.
If I were not a Jaina,
it would be easier for me to say what I have to say, for in that case I
should not be exposed to attacks, vicious and otherwise, on the count of
bias and bigotry, in as much as the result of the investigations made by
me is the establishment of the greater antiquity of Jainism. Nevertheless,
I give my reasons for this conclusion and leave the reader to say what he
likes about me and my method.
It is now established
as the result of recent research, especially of the finds at Mohenjo-Daro,
that Jainism flourished actually long, long before the time of the twenty
third
Tirthankara,
Parsva Nath. The age of the finds at Mohenjo-Daro is probably 5000-7000
years ago in the past. Hinduism also flourished then side by side with
Jainism. The question is, which of them is prior in time?
Of the scriptures of
Hinduism it is now recognized on all hands that the
Rig
Veda
is the oldest, so that if we are to understand its origin we can only do
so with the aid of the Rig
Veda,
which appears to be the oldest written scripture extant. The language of
the Rig
Veda
is certainly older than the language of any of the Jaina Books, but this
may be due to its expression being fixed up, by poetry, before that of any
of the Jaina works, which are known to have existed in memory alone at one
time. The test of language is therefore, unreliable in this case, though
if there was nothing to contradict it, it would carry the point a long way
in favor of Hinduism.
But we shall turn to
the intrinsic evidence of the oldest
Veda.
The question is, what was the religion of the people who possessed only
the Rig Veda and none of the subsequent accumulations and accretions of
scriptural lore now possessed by the Hindus?
The Rig Veda has been
subjected to a great deal of criticism by friend and foe in recent times,
but no one has found in its four corners ought but the worship of such
things as the sun, clouds fire and the like. There is no trace of the
essentials of the Hindu Religion, as they are known today, in the hymns of
the great Veda. Transmigration and
Karma,
renunciation and asceticism, and
yoga
are not to be found in the Rig Veda, or at least have to be spelt out with
great labor from the text. The summum bonum --Nirvana--
itself is not present to the mind in the medley of what appears to be pure
nature worship.
European scholars
have in reality not found anything but superstition and idolatry in the
poetry of the
Rig
Veda.
If this view be taken to be true, then the purport of the
Veda
would hardly be termed religion by any thoughtful person, seeking to know
what salvation implied and how was transmigration to be brought to an end,
karma
broken through and Nirvana
attainted. As such it would not be worth the while of a Jaina to seek to
establish the greater anciency of his own religion, which from the
earliest times known has consistently taught the path to Bliss and
Blessedness in Nirvana
by the destruction of karmas.
For it is frankly admitted in Jainism that superstition and Enlightenment
are coeval. Indeed the 'Light' may disappear from time to time and
reappear again, but superstition in one form or another is more or less
continuous. The position would then simply be this, that among religions
Jainism would be the oldest, but amongst the creeds that fostered
nature-worship that of the Rig Veda would be taken to be the most ancient.
But this view is
falsified by a scientific study of comparative religion. What this study
has revealed clearly to me is that under-lying this very seeming nature-
worship lies hidden a scientific teaching and a doctrine which is
identical in all respects with the Teaching of the Jinas. The Sun for
instance is emblematic of the fullness of knowledge and not a gigantic
moving star; Indra is the soul embodied in matter; Agni is
Tapascharana
which leads to release from the bondage of
karma
and transmigration. Those scholars who took the gods of the Rig Veda to
stand for nature powers did not have their attention drawn to the
possibility of a secret religious or spiritual interpretation, and
therefore merely put down the creed of the Vedas a a form if idolatry and
superstition. I shall not attempt in this article to demonstrate the truth
of my interpretation, but am content to refer the reader to my books in
which the subject has been dealt with at great length and the legends and
myths of different countries and creeds have been interpreted in a
scientific way. Here it is sufficient to state that my interpretations are
in full accord with the true spirit of Hinduism and the elucidation of the
Hindu Scriptures themselves.
I take it, then, that
instead of being a mere ancient form of nature cult, the religion of the
Rig Veda is revealed to be a scientific and systematic one, the most
remarkable feature of which is its complete agreement with Jainism. In
different language, Jainism and Hinduism are found to be teaching the same
thing, though the one uses plain languages and the other is concealed in
disguise and mystifying thought.
When did any of them
really originate we do not know, if we leave out of consideration the
evidence to the contrary furnished by the Jaina Books. The only material
from which a deduction for the greater ancientness in favor of any one of
them can be drawn thus is the fact that they teach the same thing, and
that the language of the Veda is allegorical while that of Jainism is
plain.
But I think that this
fact is quite sufficient to determine the comparative ages of the two
Faiths. For it is clear to me that allegory must have had a basis of prior
fact to fix itself upon. If the Teaching was not known before, how could
it be allegorized? In other words, who so ever allegorized the doctrines
of the Science of Salvation must have known them, so that allegory is
easily posterior to science or fact.
Shall we now try to
seek a scientific basis for the allegories of the Rig Veda outside
Jainism? But such an attempt is foredoomed to fail, for we have not the
faintest trace of any such religion if Jainism is to be rejected. The best
thing is to recognize that such a rejection will be simply the outside of
prejudice, and not an act prompted by good reason. There has been no other
scientific and scientifically expressed religion in the world, and
certainly there was none beyond 7000 years ago in the past.
It is not necessary
for the purposes of this article to insist upon the absolute accuracy of
the Teaching of Religion, though I am fully convinced of it. The historian
has not studied the subject, and cannot be readily expected to accept my
ipse
dixit
on the point. It is sufficient for my present purpose if it be understood
that the teachings of the Rig Veda, when properly interpreted and
understood reveal identically the same groundwork of scientifically
expressed thought as is found in Jainism. If this is once accepted it
would follow that both these religions, namely, Jainism and Veda are
merely the work of the one and the same body of men, some of whom
allegorized the Teaching of their Religion, while some did not. We can
say, if we like, that there was a scientific religion of the ancient
Aryans which is expressed in allegorical garb in the Rig Veda, but which
was handed down in plain language, as Jainism, to those who did not
allegorize. Sharp differences would naturally arise between the followers
of the two faiths after the lapse of a sufficient time when the purport
and meaning of the allegories was obscured and lost, so that there is
nothing surprising if the Hindus and the Jainas have not been the best of
friends in the world for centuries.