|
Jain World
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
History of the Digambaras |
Rashtrakutas
The Rashtrakutas ruled over a large area in the center of India for two
centuries beginning with the middle of the 8th century. One of the
important patrons of learning among them was Amoghavarsha Nripatunga
(815-877). He was himself a scholar, and wrote an important Kannada work
on poetics. One of his ecpithets was Atishayadhavala.36 Jinasena wrote the
Jain Adipurana during his period. The commentary on the certain parts of
the Shatkhandagama was also perhaps prepared during his period. This
commentary is known as Jayadhavala.
It was during Amoghavarsha's time that Ugraditya wrote a treatise on
medicine called Kalyanakaraka.37 It is a voluminous work in Sanskit
containing 8,000 slokas. Ugraditya says that the original author of this
work was Pujyapada, and he had only revised and enlarged it. Who this
Pujyapada was is not clear? The famous Pujyapada was not known to be a
writer on medicine.
Ugraditya divides the book in eight chapters, as was usual with other
contemporary Ayurvedic works. However his main attempt was to eliminate
the use in medicine of meat and other similar animal products and all
types of intoxicants. In other words, it prescribed only those medicines
that a Jain could safety take. The author refers to Agnivesha, Kashyapa
and Charaka among the ancient authors but does not mention Susruta or
Nagar Juna. Mercury and other metals are important ingredients medicine in
the Kalyanakaraka. This was perhaps due to the introduction of Arabic
influence, for, mercury and other metals though mentioned are not very
important as medicines in earlier Indian works.
Another scholar who flourished during this period was the Jain
mathematician Mahaviracharya, who wrote his Ganitasarasangraha 38 in c.
850. Mahavira found out the rule for calculating the number of
combinations of n things taken r at a time (problem number VI, 218). This
can be put in the modern notation as
n!
------------
r! (n-r)!
It is, however, not certain that it was his discovery, for Mahvira never
refers to any earlier mathematicians, not even to Brahmagupta whose famous
rule for the area of the (cyclic) quadrilateral he mentions. 39
A mathematical discovery of this period was the use of logarithms for
calculations with large numbers. These logarithms were with the bases 2,
3, and 4. Reference to the use of logarithms occurs for the first time in
the Dhavala commentary mentioned above. Use of logarithms for the ease of
calculations with large numbers that occur in Jain cosmology, continued at
least for a hundred years, for Nemichandra at the end of the tenth century
mentions the rule of logarithm (which he called ardhacchheda, i.e.,
logarithm at the base 2), as:
"The ardhachheda of the multiplier plus the ardhachheda of the
multiplicand is the ardhachheda of the product" Trilokasara, Gatha 105)
or, in modern notations,
log2A + log2B = log2 A.B
Later Gangas
In the later centuries of Ganga rule in southern Karnataka we see evidence
of great material prosperity of the Jains. Epigraphic records indicate
that these rulers were all patrons of the Jains and made grants to various
Jain temples. Indeed, some of them might have themselves become Jains.
These were Nitimarga I (853-870), Nitimarga II (907- 935), Marasinha III
((960-974), etc. In fact, Marasinha III died by the Jain vow of
starvation, known as Sallekhana in the presence of Ajitasena Bhattaraka in
AD 974. 40
Some ministers and generals of these Ganga rulers also were devout Jains
and spent large sums of money in building temples and other architectural
monuments. The 17 meter high statue of Bahubali was built at Sravana
Belgola by Chamundaraya in 983. Chamundaraya was the minister and general
of Rachamalla, a king of the Ganga dynasty.
Nemichandra, the famous Digambara scholar was a friend of this minister.
Three of Nemichandra's works are still considered quite important for the
sect. These are Trilokasara, Labdhisara and Gommatasara. The first is a
work on Jain cosmography. Nemichandra displayed his mathematical talent in
writing this book. The other two works are on Jain philosophy. (All these
three works of Nemichandra were translated into Hindi prose by Todarmal of
Jaipur, in the 18th century).
The Gangas ruled over south Karnataka from the fourth to the 10th century
and all through their period they were helpful towards the Jains.
Hoysalas
Karnataka entered its period of artistic glory with the establishment of
the Hoysala dynasty in the 12th century. The capital of the Hoysalas was
at Dorasamudra. They attained great power under Vishucardhana (1111-52)
and his grand son Vira Ballala II. The last notable ruler of this dynasty
was Vira Ballala III. He sustained defeats at the hands of Kafur, the
general of Ala-ud-din Khailji, and finally perished in or about 1342.
The Hoysala kings built many beautiful temples in south Karnataka. These
temples are the glories of Indian art. While the kings built temples of
the Shiv and Vaishnava faiths, their ministers and the merchant princes
among their subjects built Jain temples. Ganga Raja, a general and
minister of Visuvardhana the greatest of the Hoysals, built the
Parshvantha basadi (basadi in Karnataka means a Jain temple) at
Chamarajanagar near Mysore. Gangaraja also built the surrounding enclosure
to the statue of Bahubali in Sravana Belgola. In 1116 Hulla who was
treasurer or bhandari for three successive years, Hoysala rulers built the
Chaturvinsati- Jinalaya (also known as the Bhandari-basadi) in Sravana
Belgola. Another basadi in the vicinity is the Viraballabha- Jainalya
built in honor of the Hoysala king Viraballabha II by a merchant in 1176.
We thus see that all these dynasties that ruled over Karnataka were
friendly to the Jains. Schubring has well summarized the situation:
"Individually as well as in their subsequent members quite a number of
princely houses such as the Ganga, Rashtrakuta, Chalukya, Hoysala have
proved friendly to the Jains. And yet taking into account the well-known
versatility of the Indian princes in religious affairs, we must be careful
not to overrate the role acted by Jainism in political life, and it is
rather bold to speak of "adeptes ad jainism" (initiated into Jainism) in
this connection. It may be assumed, that more often than not it was for
reasons of prudence, that it was thought necessary to suit the order so
influential owing to its wealthy laymen."41 Schubring is generally correct
in his assessment. Some later Ganga kings it appears actually were
initiated into Jainism. But the evidence for this was not available to
Schubring when he wrote in 1934.
Viyayanagara Empire
This empire was known among other things for the revival of Brahmanic
learning but if we go by the number of existing monuments spread
throughout the empire, it was also a period of great building activity of
the Jains.
In fact the large building activity seen among the Jains was due to the
fact that the main commercial class of Karnataka, the Vira Banajigas had
become ardent Jains. As Saletare puts it, "The real clue to the
understanding of the high position which Jainism held in the land is seen
in the ardor and devotion of the commercial"42 classes; and again, "with
the immense wealth of which Vira Banajigas were the traditional
custodians, the Jain sages had magnificent Jinalayas and images
constructed".43
If we take the period from the 10th to the early 17th century, we find
that the main center of constructional activity of the Jains in the first
half of this period was Sravana Belgola, but by the second half of this
period the center had shifted westwards towards Karkala, almost on the
sea-coast near Mangalore. Karkala itself was the seat of the Bhairarasa
Wodeyars,44 a powerful Jain family (of which no representatives are now
left.) The second largest image of Gommatadeva (or Bahubali) about 12.5
metres high was built here in AD 1431. It was built by Vira Pandya
Bhairarasa Wodeyar. At Haleangadi, close by is the finest Jain stambha in
the district. It has a monolithic shaft 33 feet (10 metres) high in eight
segments, each beautifully and variously ornamented, supporting an elegant
capital and topped by a stone shrine containing a statue. The total height
is about 50 feet (15 metres)". 45
Another very large Bahubali statue was built in Yenur (or Venur) now a
village in the Mangalore Taluk. The statue is 37 feet (11.1 metres) high
and was built in 1603. At that time the place must have been quite
important, for besides this statue there are numerous other Jain remains
there.46
The place nearby which became the center of Jainism in South India in the
period 13th to the early 17th century is Mudabadri, about 16 kilometers
from Karkala. The place is so important that it is described as Jain-Kasi.
This Jain center is said to have been started near about AD 714 when a
monk from Sravana Belgola established the first Jain temple, the
Parshvanatha-basadi here. The place became important after 1220, when an
important acharya Charukirti Panditcharya arrived here from Sravana
Belgola.47
From then on wards till the early 17th century this whole area was a scene
of large constructional activity of the Jains. The architectural style
adopted was also peculiar. As Fergusson remarks, "When we descend the
Ghats into Kanada, or the Tulava country, we come on a totally different
state of matters. Jainism is the religion of the country, and all or
nearly all the temples belong to this sect, but their architecture is
neither the Dravidian style of the south, nor that of northern India, and
indeed is not known to exist anywhere else in India proper, but recurs
with all its peculiarities in Nepal.
"They are much plainer than Hindu temples generally are. The pillars look
like logs of wood with the angles partially chamfered off, so as to make
them octagons, and the sloping roofs of the verandas are so evidently
wooden that the style itself cannot be far removed from a wooden
original...
"The feature however which presents the greatest resemblance to the
northern (i.e. Nepalese) styles, is the reverse slope of the eaves above
the varandah. I am not aware of its existence anywhere else south of
Nepal, and it is so peculiar that it is much more likely to have been
copied than reinvented".48
Most of the Jain religious buildings in and near about Mudabadri were
built by the wealthy merchants of the area. The thousand pillared basadi
or temple, known as the Tribhuvana-tilaka-chuda-mani' was built by a group
of Jain merchants (settis) in 1430, and this is the most magnificent Jain
shrine in south India.49
Mudabadri temples also became depositories of Jain literature. Indeed the
famous commentaries Dhavala and Jayadhavala were found only in the
Siddhanta-basadi here.50
As the Mudabadri-Karkala area, also known as the Tuluva country, became
more and more important, the influence of Jainism declined in the rest of
South India. The one reason for this was the revival of the Brahmanical
religion under the kings of the Vijayanagar empire. The Vijayanagara kings
were not against the Jains. In fact, they were always consoling just when
any civil dispute arose between the Jains and others. Saletore51 cites two
cases, one in 1363 and the other in 1368, where the disputes between the
two antagonistic groups of Jains and non-Jains were amicably settled by
the Vijayanagara rulers. These settlements were duly recorded in stone
inscriptions. The cause of the decline was thus not the hostility of the
kings. It has to be looked some where else.
Of all the places in South India, it was Karnataka where Jainism was
strongest. Two things happened there, which in the course of a few
centuries, reduced the influence of Jainism in the greater part of the
region. Ultimately by the 16th century its stronghold was left only in one
corner of the region. That is in the Tuluva country, round about Karkala,
Mudabadre, etc. The first of this was the rise of the Vira-Shiv or the
Lingayat religion under the leadership of Basava in the 12 century. He
himself being a minister was able to convert many of the local chiefs such
as the Santaras, rulers of Coorg, etc., to Vira-Shaivism.52
The second and perhaps the decisive reason was the conversion of the main
mercantile class the Vira Banajigas from Jainism to Vira-Shaivism.53 By
this one stroke the main patrons of Jainism were lost to a rival religion.
Added to this was the fact that after the period of the acharyas, say, by
the end of the 9th century, there were no out standing Jain leaders in
Karnataka to give fresh intellectual life to this community.
Jainism, therefore, slowly became extinguished in south India, leaving
comparatively small pockets of devotees in the centers, which were great
at one time. These were, for instance, Sravana Belgola and Mudabadre. Jain
religious groups have survived there to this day. So far as the other
scattered Jain populations were concerned the richer people among them
were converted to some Brahmanical religion such as Vaishnavism or
Shaivism, and the poorer mostly took to farming and thus became
inconspicuous.
The indigenous Jains who are left in South India today are endogamous
clans and so do not intermarry with the Jains of North India. They are all
Digambaras and are dividend into four main castes, viz. Setavala (not
found in Karnataka), Chaturtha, Panchama, and Bogara or Kasara, and three
small castes, Upadhyayas, Kamboja and Harada. Their priests are Brahmans.
"Each of the four main castes in the South is led by its own spiritual
leader (bhattaraka), who occupying intermediary positions between ascetics
and laymen can individually resolve disputes between the members of the
caste and expel from it whom so ever he considers it necessary."54 The
Chaturthas are mainly agriculturists, the Setavalas are agriculturists as
well as tailors, the Kasaras or the Bogaras are coppersmiths, and the
members of the Panchama caste follow any of these professions.55
The Digambaras of North India
Thanks to the numerous stone inscriptions and religious literature found
in South India, more or less a continuous history of the Digambaras Jains
can be traced from the 5th to 17th century AD. We know much less about the
Digambara communities in the north during the corresponding period. As
stated earlier, most of the statues of the Tirthankaras that have been
found in the 4th and 5th century in the area now covered by Uttar Pradesh,
were nude. The majority of the Jains in this area today are Digambaras. We
may thus conclude that when finally the great schism occurred (and this
might have been a gradual process) the Jains of north India found
themselves in the Digambara camp. Later monuments also support the view
that most of the Jains of eastern and northern Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and
Orissa were also Digambaras. Mention has already been made of the
Digambara images found in Bihar (12th century), and Orissa (11th to 15th
centuries). Much more important is the Jain group of temples in Khajuraho
(10th-11th century). These are all Digambara temples and must have been
built by the rich merchants living in the capital city of Chandela Rajput
kings of Bundelkhand. One temple in this group, that of Parshvanatha, has
even been compared favorably56 with the renowned Kandarya Mahadev temple
of this place. Another important group of Digambara Temples is in Deogarh
in Jhansi district. The Jain merchants of Bundelkhand were perhaps as well
looked after by the Chandela rulers as their counterparts were in
Karnataka.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|