Traits of a Discourser
Now, the traits of a (true) discourser are being
described:- (1) He must be firm in Jaina-faith; for, if he himself is a
misbeliever, how can he make others true believer? The listeners by
themselves possess less intellect, how would he make them true believer
through some logic? And the right belief only is the basis of all
religion. (2) He should have developed the ability to deliver discourses
on Shastras through the study of scriptures because without
attaining such ability how can he be eligible for preaching? (3) Through
right knowledge, he should be able to discriminate the gist of all sorts
of empirical (Vyavahara) and real (Nishchaya) etc. forms of
expositions; for, if this be not there then if there be some description
with some different purpose, there he might draw some other meaning and
become instrumental in wrong conduct. (4) He should be very fearful of
going against the omniscient commandment because if this be not so then
bearing some purpose in mind he may preach against the 'Sutras'
(Scripture) and create misery for Jivas. So is stated below:-
Bahugunravijyanrilyo, asutbhasee thavi mutvo
Jah varmanri juto vi hu, vighyro visehro lohai
(u. si. r.
mala)
The one who possesses many virtues like forbearance,
modesty, etc, and has knowledge of grammar, etc, but is a perverse
discourser (wrong-interpreter) he is worth discarding. For instance, a
snake though possessing costliest jewel, yet it is only a source of
trouble in the world. (5) He must not have any desire of accomplishing the
temporal acts like earning livelihood etc., by means of giving discourses
on Shastras; for, if he has expectation then he cannot preach (the
truth) correctly; he simply makes it a source of accomplishing his
objective by giving lectures according to the desire of some listeners.
Moreover, the preacher's rank is higher than that of listeners; but, if
the preacher be greedy, then the preacher will himself become inferior and
the listeners will become superior. (6) He should not have intense anger
and pride, because the highly- passionate (angry & haughty) person will be
criticized, the listeners will be fearful of him, then how would they be
benefitted by him? (7) He should himself raise different questions and
provide answers or if other people raise questions many times in different
ways, then through soft (sweet) words he should clarify in such a way that
their doubt is removed. In case he himself does not have the capacity to
answer rightly then he should say that he himself lacks knowledge of it;
for, if this be not so, the doubt of the listeners will not be removed.
How will then there be good of them? And the glorification of Jaina-faith
will also not be possible. (8) He should not indulge in any immoral and
publicly censurable activities, for he would become a place of laughter
due to indulgence in publicly censurable deeds; who would then trust his
words? He will bring bad name to Jaina faith. (9) He should not be of low
caste, not be a crippled fellow, not have hoarse voice, be of sweet
tongue, should be influential so that he may be acceptable to the people,
for, if it be not so then the orator's greatness will not be reflected in
him. The above qualities are essential in the discourser. The same is
stated in Atmanushasana:-
"Pragya praptsmastshasthridya prvyaktloksthiti
Prastash pratibhaper preshmvan pragaiv drishtoter
Praya prshanseh prabhu permanoharee pranindya
Booyaduthrmkatha ganree gunree gunrnidhi
prspashtmishtaksher"
The one who is brilliant, has grasped the gist of all
Shastras, is graceful in public life, desire-free, lustrous,
dispassionate and one who knows the answer even before the question is
raised, should have great forbearance for facing several questions, be
influential, could win the hearts of others because of being free from the
criticism of others as well as of his own by others, be store of virtues
and whose words are clear and sweet - such a leader of the congregation
should deliver the discourses.
Further, the special characteristic of a discourser is
such that if he knows grammar, logic, etc, and possesses deep knowledge of
voluminous Jaina Shastras then his oration will be more glorious.
Moreover, in spite of all these qualities, if he has not acquired
self-realization through spiritual taste, then he is not likely to know
the spirit (essence) of Jina Dharma (Omniscients' religion),
he is a discourser merely traditionally. How can he explain the
characteristic of the true Jina Dharma which is full of
spiritual taste? Therefore, if he be an enlightened self - Atma-Jnani
then only he is a true preacher. In Pravachansara also it is stated
that Agama-Jnana (knowledge of scripture), Tattvartha-Sharaddhana
(faith in Jiva-AJiva, etc, essential principles), Sanyama
Bhava (continence) - these three if are devoid of self-knowledge (Atma-Jnana),
they are ineffective. Further in Doha-Pahuda it is stated
that :-
"Pandiya pandiya pandiya kanr chorhi vi tus kandiya
Pya atham tutheesi parmath nr janryi moodhosi"
"Oh Pandey! Oh Pandey! Oh Pandey! You are leaving the
grain thrashing the husk only. You are satisfied in words and their
literal meanings, but do not know the reality, therefore, you are
assuredly a fool".
Moreover, in fourteen types of learning's, the
metaphysics (spiritual science) is described as to be the supreme of all.
Therefore, the discourser who is fond of the taste of spiritual science
should be known as the discourser of the mystery of Jina-Dharma.
Further, the discoursers who possess extra-ordinary intellectual power and
are possessed of clairvoyance, telepathy, omniscience are to be known as
the great preachers. Such should be known the distinctive traits of the
discoursers.
So, if one gets the association of a discourser
possessing these distinctive traits, it is highly beneficial and if not
obtained then one ought to listen the Shastras from the mouth of
those discoursers only who possess qualities of right belief, etc. It is
desirable to listen to the Shastras from the mouth of Munis
(monks) and Shravakas (house-holders) possessing such
characteristics and it is not worth listening the Shastras
customarily or with the greed of listening the Shastras from the
mouth of sinful persons, who are not possessed of the right-belief, etc.
traits. Also it is said that:-
"Tn jinr anr prainr ya dhamo soyv suguru pasmi
Ah uchiyo seddhao, tssuv aisas kehgao // 23 (a.si.r.)"
The one who is attentive in obeying the omniscients
commandments, it is worth-while for him to listen to the sermons from (the
mouth of) a Nirgrantha (naked without possessions) true preceptor
monk or should listen to religious discourses from the proper true
believer Shravaka (householder) who interprets the sermons of the
true preceptor only.
Only such discourser, who preaches with religious
attitude, can do good of the self and of other Jivas (capable
souls) also, and one who preaches with passion attitude, harms himself as
well as other Jivas.
Characteristics of Listeners
Now the characteristics of a listener are being
described. He whose future seems to be bright, thinks "Who am I? What is
my inherent nature? How is this all happening to me? What will be the
fruit of the thoughts and feelings arising in me? Jiva (the self)
is suffering from miseries, so what is the mean of ending the miseries? I
have to find out the solution of all these questions and should do that
which is beneficial to me"- with such thoughts he has become active.
Believing that this object can be achieved by listening to Shastras
listens to Shastras enthusiastically, asks whatever is to be asked,
ponders repeatedly in his inner self over the meaning explained by the
preceptors and after determining the true meaning by his own thoughts
makes efforts to achieve the desirable such is the differentia of a new
listener.
Further, those who are the firm believers of Jina-Dharma
and whose intellect has been sharpened by listening to different
Shastras and having known thoroughly well the differentia of
Vyavahar (conventional) and Nishchay (realistic) stand points,
etc, whatever sermon they listen to grasp it correctly by knowing what it
really means; and whenever a question arises they most humbly raise the
question or by mutual discussion on different questions and answers take
decision about the things, keep deeply engrossed in the study of
scripture, have discarded censurable acts with religious attitude. - Such
ought to be the listeners of Shastras.
Special Characteristics of the Listeners (of Jaina-Shastras)
If a listener possesses some knowledge of grammar,
logic and of voluminous Jaina Shastras, then the listener is
praiseworthy. And even if there be such a listener but be devoid of
Atma-Jnana (self-knowledge) he can not understand the gist of
the sermons. Therefore, the one who has tasted (the blissful nature of)
the self-soul through self- realisation, he is the real listener of the
mystery of Jina- Dharma. Further, the one who possesses
extra ordinary intellectual power or the clairvoyance, telepathy
knowledge, then he is to be known as an excellent listener. Such are the
special qualities of the listeners. Such should be the listeners of the
Jina-Shatras.
Moreover, those who listen to Shastras believing
that listening to Shastras will be beneficial to them but due to
weakness of knowledge do not understand much, to them Punya-
Bandha (bondage of auspicious karmas) occurs, but the specific
purpose can not be achieved. And those who listen to Shastras
either by family tradition or customarily or incidentally or simply listen
but do not retain any thing, so according to their thoughts and feelings,
sometimes Punya- Bandha (inauspicious bondage) or sometimes
Papa Bandha (inauspicious bondage) is caused to them. And
those who listen to Shastras with pride or jealousy or whose
intention is only of arguing and those who listen to Shastras
simply for being called the great person or for the sake of fulfilling
some greed, etc. or those who listen to Shastras but do not like it
- to such listeners the Papa- Bandha alone is caused. Such are the various
traits of listeners. Similarly. it should be inferred about the persons
indulging in learning, teaching activities, etc.
Thus the characteristics of discoursers and
listeners of the Shastras have-been described. Hence, the right
Shastra, should be read and listened to by becoming a right discourser
and a right listener.